Hi Dne Sun, 10 May 2009 14:34:53 -0700 Kristis Makris <kristis.mak...@asu.edu> napsal(a):
> Could you please help in trying to resolve this issues with packaging > scmbug ? > > On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 19:16 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scmbug". > > > > > > * Package name : scmbug > > > Version : 0.26.13 > > > Upstream Author : Kristis Makris <kristis.mak...@asu.edu> > > > * URL : http://www.mkgnu.net/?q=scmbug > > > * License : GPL > > > Section : devel > > > > > > It builds these binary packages: > > > scmbug-common - Scmbug common libraries. > > > scmbug-doc - Scmbug documentation. > > > scmbug-server - Scmbug integration server. > > > scmbug-tools - Scmbug integration tools. > > > > > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scmbug > > > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > > > main contrib non-free > > > - dget > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scmbug/scmbug_0.26.13.dsc > > > > > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > > > Very quick look at the package: > > > > 1. Do not make package native. > > What do I need to do to change the package into being non-native ? > How/where do I specify the non-native version number ? > > > 2. Please create proper debian directory and not by symlink to some > > directory with templates and other crap in it. > > Why not ? Because it breaks some tools which check archive and makes NMUs needlessly complicated. > Debian is not the only distribution this system is packaged for. I don't > like to have a top-level directory called "debian" in the source code > repository. Instead, I have a directory called packaging/debian. There is no need to have debian packaging things in upstream. > > 4. Build fails as there are some hardcoded paths: > > make: Entering an unknown directory > > make: > > *** /home/mkgnu/devel/scmbug.0.26.13/SCMBUG_RELEASE_0-26-13/src/tests: > > No such file or directory. Stop. make: Leaving an unknown directory > > make[1]: *** [clean] Error 2 > > > > Full log is at http://tmp.cihar.com/scmbug_0.26.13_amd64.build > > There are no hardcoded paths in the build process. I'm not sure why this > error occurs. Have you looked at Makefile in your package? It contains this path on dozens of lines. > This link is no longer valid. Yes, it is valid for month, I don't keep such things forever. To reproduce it run fakeroot debian/rules clean on your sources. > > 6. Please use litian: > > > > $ lintian -IE --pedantic scmbug_0.26.13.dsc > > W: scmbug source: ancient-standards-version 3.5.2 (current is 3.8.0) > > I: scmbug source: build-depends-without-arch-dep docbook-dsssl > > I: scmbug source: build-depends-without-arch-dep docbook-utils > > I: scmbug source: build-depends-without-arch-dep transfig > > I: scmbug source: build-depends-without-arch-dep imagemagick > > W: scmbug source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.log > > W: scmbug source: configure-generated-file-in-source config.status > > Is it necessary that I correct warnings ? For most sponsors this is required, unless you have good reason to keep them (= it is a lintian bug or you add override with proper reasoning). > > 7. Source should match the one available on upstream website: > > $ md5sum SCMBUG_RELEASE_0-26-13.tar.gz scmbug_0.26.13.tar.gz > > a5c92c23e8c2fa5f67a389e12c04aacd SCMBUG_RELEASE_0-26-13.tar.gz > > d5645be5bc4a620f8f9db67a11662f0b scmbug_0.26.13.tar.gz > > I don't understand how dpkg-buildpackage prepared this new .tar.gz file. You should not make native package. Then tarball would match the original one and all packaging changes will be in separate file. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
