-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ben Finney schrieb:
> There is vagueness in the Policy and significant disagreement among
> developers over whether ‘debian/copyright’ actually needs to list all
> the work's copyright holders and statements. Current practice in many
> packages leans toward “no”, while actions of (some of?) the ftpmasters
> leans toward “yes”.
>
> I don't know which way this is going to resolve, but it's good to be
> aware that the position Patrick espouses may or may not represent
> consensus of the Debian project.
Yes I am aware of the current discussion, but some (2?) packages have
been rejected in the last months because of an incomplete/missing
copyright holder listing. So it is `at the moment' better to include
them if you want to have an ACCEPT.
But I also want to see a good general consensus of it..
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAknzF4cACgkQ2XA5inpabMcXDQCgktIrpVc0OUziwB18JhHzC3Sz
1wEAoJH27DtlR9G+U2G/ygIMfyUpJk5V
=3/9D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
