Hi Ben, Comparisons like “clone of foopackage, but different” aren't very > helpful in the synopsis. (They are fine in the long description though.) >
I found it with that description, and seems that was long time. But if description is not appropriate, So I can change it > Better would be to spend the limited synopsis space to say what the > package *is*, rather than what it is like or what it is not. In the > synopsis it's okay to be similar to other packages; the long description > can be used for distinctions. Ok, I will take it into account. But first I would like first, the upstream author's opinion or some mentor. I think may be: popular command-line mp3 player (according to: http://mpg321.sourceforge.net/) Thanks so much, Ben Elías