Piotr Ożarowski <pi...@debian.org> writes: > * 0.1~svn.r5690-1 was never uploaded to Debian, please mark it as > UNRELEASED or (and I prefer this one, BTW) merge -2 and -1
Okay, I will release 0.1~svn.r5690-3 and mark previous releases of the same version as ‘UNRELEASED’. > * add minimum required runtime version to python-docutils: >= 0.5-3 Done. Just so I'm sure that I understand, this is because this package now depends on a ‘python-docutils’ built with ‘python-support’, yes? > * what did you have to change in order to bump Standards-Version to > 3.8.1? (changelog doesn't mention it) Done. > * lintian 2.2.9 only informs about > extended-description-is-probably-too-short, please remove all > overrides Aren't we supposed to release packages that are lintian clean, even to the ‘info’ level? > * BTW, you have some patches on debian-python ML that make debian/rules a > little bit nicer in this package I've been working on these for a new upstream version, but will roll them into this new release first. Done. -- \ “Holy unrefillable prescriptions, Batman!” —Robin | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org