Raphael Geissert <atomo64+deb...@gmail.com> (11/12/2008): > If it is lintian warning or error then chances are high that there > *is* a bug.
Chances.
> 1) ancient-libtool is about porting,
is there an FTBFS bug open? Said otherwise: is there an arch where there
is an actual FTBFS?
> 2) debhelper-but-no-misc-depends is about missing dependencies,
is there really a missing dependency that gets added once the
${misc:Depends} is added, and the package rebuilt?
> 3) patch-system-but-direct-changes-in-diff and
> configure-generated-file-in-source are both, in this case, related to
> the same bug: lack of proper cleanup.
which doesn't necessarily break double-build support, so that looks
cosmetic enough to me not to be called a “bug”.
> If the diffstat is not large, and the changes are not just cosmetic,
> it is very likely that it will get unblocked.
My point exactly. All the above look cosmetic to me unless a real bug is
actually found.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
