2008/11/10 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Hi Guido,
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:46, Guido Loupias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > 2008/11/10 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The changes I introduced in 0.5.5-1 and 0.5.5-2 have been applied
> upstream.
> > So in essence there are no changes (except for that 1 patch) to the
> debian
> > revision with respect to the upstream version. Hence the short list of
> > changes.
>
> Ahhh now it's clear :D
>
> > The revised -1 revision wouldn't upload after I editted the changelog. It
> > said there
> > was nothing to upload because there were no changes.
>
> what tools give you error? dput/dupload or mentors.d.n? if dput,
> remove *.upload, if mentors remove the previous upload first.
>
> > Am I understanding correctly then that in order for a revision to be
> updated
> > the previous revision has to be in the debian archive first? I recall two
> > other
> > mentors telling me that it is good practice to increment the debian
> revision
> > even if the archive only made it to mentors and never to the debian
> > archives.
>
> Personally, I'm strong against their suggestion: having a new revision
> for every single upload to mentors for even small fix requested by the
> sponsor is really annoying and can generate confusion to the end users
> reading the  changelog: what if the ask "what changes from the latest
> version I have installed on the system" and found 6 revisions each for
> "added watch file"+"removed commented line from debian/rules"+"added a
> ',' char to short description" or so is really really ugly.
>
> this is my opinion, their and mine being technical correct.


Alright. I will try to upload a -1 revision when I'm home.


> > I am a little confused now.
>
> Yeah, sorry about that :) each sponsor has its own set of rules,
> characteristics or so he/she wants to see in a package he's gonna
> sponsor, that's the reason for the differences in replies and
> suggestion (still being correct both ways).


Thanks for the explanation. I get it now. :)

Kind regards,
Guido Loupias

Reply via email to