On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 09:44:44PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Generally, I don't recommend that anyone on this list seriously > considers packaging shared libraries until they have a couple of > ordinary binary packages in the archive. I would agree with that. Debian packaging is quite daunting for someone who's not seen it before, let alone packaging a library. Some upstream Makefiles are packager-friendly and others it looks like they go out of their way to make life tough.
dh-make helps, but it cannot cater for everything. Another problem with your email is you don't actually say what is going wrong. - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
