On Monday 22 September 2008 15:20:20 Cameron Dale wrote: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We've been using apt-proxy for about a year, and then found it quite > > buggy. So we moved to using apt-cacher. Now we have loads of problems > > with apt-cacher as well (like currently, a recurring tzdata size > > mismatch error). I was wondering if approx is any better than the other > > two. Did any of you try? > > I have also experienced similar problems with both apt-proxy and > -cacher. I am now using approx, and I can report no errors with it at > all. It may be slightly slower, but that could be my imagination. I > would definitely recommend approx.
I agree, approx has served myself well for quite some time. Thanks, Kel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
