On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 22:32 +0800, Paul Wise escribió: > > #474020 should not have been closed with a -done message, instead you > > should have closed it in the changelog of the new version. Leave it > > as-is for now though. > > Yes, but since It wasn' a lynis bug, I decided to close it with a email. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough; there are two issues in that bug report: 1) please package the latest upstream of lynis (1.0.9 at the time) 2) the warning due to a broken sources.list, which was marked as a "side note" by the bug reporter #1 is still valid and #2 was invalid at the time. The appropriate action would have been to leave the bug open and add something like this to the changelog: * New upstream release (Closes: #474020) No need to do this now though for just a wishlist bug, something to keep in mind for the future though. > > What is the reason for adding the dnsutils suggests? > > I add dnsutils suggests because in /include/tests_networking script, it > runs "dig" command, and this is included in dnsutils package. > The dependency is not absolute or strong. > So, according to Helmut Grohne suggestion, I decided to add a suggest > dependency. Makes sense to me. Should I upload your 1.1.1 package now or do you want to switch to quilt (or dpatch). -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
