Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:

> Justin Pryzby schrieb:
>>> It would be a pro to take this into the policy, wouldn't it?
>> 
>> It is 9.3.2:
>> 
>> | [...]
> 
> No, it isn't.

Yes, it is. You can dissect the paragraph in 3 ideas:
 - Behave sensibly when invoked with 'start' and already running
 - Behave sensibly when invoked with 'stop' and not running
 - Don't kill unfortunately named user processes.

2 and 3 are separated because of the comma before the 'and'.

-- 

  Felipe Sateler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to