Hi, Kevin Coyner escribió: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 08:43:13PM -0400, Juan Angulo Moreno wrote...... > > >>> How was Bug #279342 fixed? It is not apparent from the >>> changelog, and running interdiff between the diff files doesn't >>> show anything new in that respect. >>> >> I closed bug because when metacam was updated of version 0.6-1 to >> the 1.2-1 bug he was not present (you can verify installing it >> metacam, unloading the following image that was taken by a S60 >> Canon Camera: >> http://farm1.static.flickr.com/112/253352200_b64ab0a57a_o.jpg, >> will be able to notice that there is not segfault). >> > > O.K. Perhaps you might want to mention in the changelog that the bug > is being closed because upstream addressed it in a prior release. > Ok, Perfect. >> In the next days I will repair the package and upload it again. >> > > O.K. I'll look at it again then. BTW, I went to the homepage you > have listed for metacam, and was not able to download a source copy. > Do you have a different webpage for downloading the source? > > Software does not have another mirror where can download the source code. Could eliminate the file debian/watch so that it looks for updates of software?
> Kevin Thanks You!. -- Juan Angulo Moreno http://www.0x29.com.ve Fingerprint GPG: 0FEE E0BF 2904 FE77 1682 2171 C842 DBF1 34BC CD04 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
