On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:02:08PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:42:55PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-html-progress2". > >> > >> * Package name : php-html-progress2 > >> Version : 2.3.0-1 > >> Upstream Author : Laurent Laville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> * URL : http://download.pear.php.net/package/HTML_Progress2 > > > > This URL gives a 404. I believe you mean > > http://pear.php.net/package/HTML_Progress2 > > Yes, I did. Sorry for the mistake. > > > The URL seems to be mentioned correctly within the package though so no > > need to worry. > > > > What's worse: you install some files into the > > /usr/share/doc/php-html-progres2 directory ('s' instead of 'ss'). > > Ouuups! This is now corrected, sorry I should have check more. It's > reuploaded at the same location: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-html-progress2/php-html-progress2_2.3.0-1.dsc > > > I mainly hesitate to offer myself as a sponsor because I have a slight > > dislike for CDBS. ;) > > My previous sponsor thought it was better this way, so I changed to this > type of package.
Seems to be a common issue among DDs that there is no agreement on whether CDBS or Debhelper should be used. I for one prefer Debhelper but for very simple packages also accept CDBS. There are strangely other DDs who seem to force package maintainers to rewrite the rules files to CDBS. I don't understand that really. Package is uploaded. Kindly Christoph -- Peer review means that you can feel better because someone else missed the problem, too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
