> Hmmm, ok. BTW, I suggest you don't add this phrase to the English docs > package: > > 'Documentation varies by language. Where the main help files are not > available in your language English will be used instead.' > > I'd also suggest removing it from all the other doc package > descriptions except de and it.
Done. > 'open source' is redundant in the kicad package description since > kicad is in Debian main. Done. > You might also want the The Smith Review Project to review your description: I'll look into that. > So, the docs shipped in the .deb are "source code" - ie, the preferred > form for modification ? Looks like they are edited in OpenOffice, so I > can believe that. Yep, that's correct. I think now there is more open access to the dev tree the docs will get a lot more help from volunteers. > Unfortunately I cannot commit to sponsoring packages due to lack of > time and internet access at home. I'm at DebCamp and had a spare hour > or so to review package diffs. No problem, thanks for your time. If you know anyone that would be able to help please point them in my direction. > I believe you can re-upload the same version, you would have to check though. Yep, tested it and it works. Richard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
