* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070613 11:27]: > Otherwise, it looks much better than the initial version - I'll give you > some more comments this evening (or otherwise soon).
Some more in-detail comments now: - mkproxy seems to be a bit too generic name for me - how about etoken-mkproxy? - why does the source package contain both mkproxy.1 and mkproxy.1.in? - why does restart in etokend not delete /var/tmp/.etokend (but stop does)? (same comment for etsrvd) - please remove the commands in dh_* you don't need. - I don't see the reason why you use automake (or even have any makefile at all). You could probably install everything with just using dh_install (at least debian-specific packages usually could). Please don't take my comments too bad - the first package is always the hardest :), and the package now looks to be in good shape for me (and is considerable better then the earlier version). Thanks for your work so far. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
