Hi, > > > Too, there are actually two forms of library soname file naming used: > > libfoo.so.1.2.3 > > and > > libfoo-1.2.3.so > > Only the first one is mentioned in the various packaging guides,
hmmm ? excluding this? http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#shldevpackagecontents > so I suppose that the format libfoo-1.2.3.so only exists for historical > reasons, right? IMHO new packages have to use the form libfoo.so.1.2.3 ? That's not quite the case. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
