Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Well, just for being a bit nitpicker, it's not really lintian clean: > > > N: Processing binary package fvwm-icons (version 2001.08.13-5) ... > > I: fvwm-icons: possible-non-posix-code-in-maintainer-script postinst:4 > > '[ -d /usr/doc -a -h /usr/doc/fvwm-icons -a ' N: > > N: This script is marked as running under /bin/sh, but it seems to use a > > N: shell feature that is not defined in the POSIX standard. The feature > > N: is so common in current shells that this isn't currently considered an > > N: release critical bug and there are discussion wether policy should be > > N: amended to specifically allow the use of the feature. > > N: > > N: Examples: > > N: '-a' and '-o' as operators of 'test'. You can use shell conditionals > > N: (&& and ||) instead. > > N: 'local' scoping of variables. > > N: > > N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 10.4 for details. > > Note that, pending the current discussion in debian-devel and > debian-policy, that warning is likely to go away fairly soon.
Oh no. Please leep it since it will make script more portable. It would be best if lintian implemented --pedantic for this sort of thing for us accustomed to use "-Wall --pedcantic" to make sure we "do the right thing fromt eh beginning". Jari -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
