* Daniel Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061112 11:46]: > 0. Currently the ieee80211 headers in mainline are recent enough to > allow ipw* compiled against it. This may change again in > future, hence I compile them all the time against ieee80211.
Eh, that doesn't sound really useful. One never knows for sure what the future brings. > 1. The ipw3945 package as it is now is anyway just a "temporary" > package, because once it gets merged in mainline, the majority of > users are going to use it there. The ipw3945-package will be the only chance for users in Etch to have support for this device, at least until the newer kernels come in at Etch+half. > > Daniel, do you mind us uploading an ipw3945 package? Or would you > > rather prefer co-maintenance under, say, a SVN repository on Alioth? > > In the last few days, I was busy with legal issues after my fathers dead > (heritaging et al). I'm now working again at the packages and uploading > them. Is there any reason not to take this working package, and just upload it? I think it would be a disservice to our users if we keep an working package out of Etch. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
