[ Charles Plessy ] > Le Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 07:55:43PM -0500, Eric Evans a écrit : > > > > In exaile-0.2.4/debs there is a binary debian package of python-gpod. At > > a minimum it's cruft, at worst it's a DFSG violation since we don't have > > the corresponding source. This should be removed. > > Hi Eric, > > Actually, as the DFSG is a set of guidelines, I think that only licences > can violate them, or more precisely fail to honor them. Python-gpod is > released under the LGPL, so it is necessary to give access to the > sources when it is distributed in a binary format. If the upstream > sources are left unmodified by the Debian source package which was used > to produce this binary package, one could suppose that there is no > violation.
We need to include source. The binary package in debs/ is an aggregate work of, (apparently), libgpod and the scripts and control files used to build a binary package. We don't have the source for the packaging, and we don't have the source for libgpod, (at least not for that version). The source may be out there somewhere, but it's not in Debian and it isn't in this package. -- Eric Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
