James Westby wrote: > [Apologies for replying to my own message again, but Adam keeps > mentioning things in other channels to which I cannot respond] > > On (09/09/06 19:57), James Westby wrote: > >> After discussion on IRC it seems that a compile flag is wanted to do >> this. >> >> > > Ok, in #361400 you say you are not happy with the "included patch", > which patch do you mean by this? > > You then said on IRC that you had found a better solution, but the > current version on mentors appears to have my first patch used. > The patch is still present bu not used anymore. I call scons with several python version, just have a look to the new debian/rules ;-) > If you are after a different solution could you please explain what you > are trying to achieve, and where my patches fall short. > less debian/rules again ! > James > Thanks for your help.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
