Hi, On Sun, Sep 10, 2006, Julien Valroff wrote: > That was it! I had tried looking for the package containing the macros > but couldn't find a good way to do it... and hadn't thought it could > simply be intltool :-(
Ok, in this case, it might not be an upstream bug as you're expected to have intltool to bootstrap the package, so the macro is supposed to be there as well. > Thanks for your help, I will submit you an updated package shortly. > Should I target experimental although there are no new dependencies? The > updated package installs and runs fine in unstable... In such a case, decision to ship a 2.16 module can be taken individually, but I would upload to experimental myself for consistency, unless the 2.16 release is safe (no fancy or risky additions), and fixes bugs that no 2.14 releases fixes. Bye, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
