On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Sep 2006, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote: > >> jlhafrontend - command-line lzh archiver written in Java > >> > >> This package intends to become a free replacement of the "lha" package > >> currently in Debian non-free section. It is command-line compatible to > >> the "lha" package. Thus it works well with "file-roller", "ark", > >> "clamav", "fkiss", and "gnomekiss". > > > > Why it is named "frontend", if it is in fact the entire tool and not just a > > wrapper to call lha, which is what "lhafrontend" implies? > > "jlha" is a library written in Java. It can be found at > http://homepage1.nifty.com/dangan/Content/Program/Java/jLHA/jLHA.html > > "jlhafrontend" is just a wrapper to call "jlha" and provides > command-line compatibility to the non-free "lha".
Well, the name is correct, then. I was not aware of jlha as a library. > If the package/project name is bad, I can change it. Please give me some > idea, thanks. I don't know if it is "bad" as there is a lib jlha. But my personal preference would be to name the *package* either jlha-utils (or libjlha-utils, maybe) or jlha-bin/libjlha-bin, and name the tool itself jlha (i.e. you get the jlha library, and if you call the jlha java binary, you get the jlha tool). -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
