Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Charles Fry wrote: >> I finally found some pseudo-official documentation on this: >> >> http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue >> >> which confirms what you said: >> >> "Currently, the only valid use of this feature in Debian is to add >> non-standard library path (like /usr/lib/<package>) to libraries that >> are only intended to be used by the executables (or other libraries) >> within the package."
> Shouldn't those cases be fixed via LD_LIBRARY_PATH? No. Basically, you should never use LD_LIBRARY_PATH if you can possibly help it; it causes a bunch of really obnoxious problems like causing sub-proceses run by that process to potentially get the wrong libraries. It's too large of a lever. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]