Russ Allbery said:
I hate to say this, since actually implementing it is a lot of work in
supporting programs like debhelper, but if the debconf-2.0 pseudopackage
was introduced prior to a new feature in the debconf interface there needs
to be a debconf-2.1 or debconf-3.0 as well.  If cdebconf implements that
protocol, it can provide that pseudopackage as well.

Agreed. IANADD, but I would depend on debconf-2.1 and when anybody complains point to russ's message.

--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to