On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 10:54 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > In the case of ETL, the intent of 'supplement' is > > simply 'adding new datatypes and functions'. The intent > > of 'compliment' is 'which combine well with the existing > > types and functions'. > > I would suggest to use this phrase instead of "compliment and > supplement" in the package description. IMHO "compliment and > suppliment" *sounds* too much like a sequence of buzzwords with no > actual meaning behind them, even if there is.
I've added this to the description and re-uploaded. Thanks for the QA work skaller and Justin. Now, is there anyone who can upload this? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
