Ionut Georgescu wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:56:37PM +0800, Li Daobing wrote: > >>Torsten Werner wrote: >> >> Package: grace6 >> >>>Severity: grave >>>Version: 5.99.0+final-7 >>> >>>Christoph Berg schrieb: >>> >>> >>>>Re: Li Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>>>I want to adopt grace6[1]. >>>>> >>>>>[1] http://bugs.debian.org/307358 >>>>> >>>>>I rebuild grace6[2], lintian and linda clean. I have upload it to >>>>>mentors.debian.net[3]. >>>> >>>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>the package looks fine. Uploaded. >>>> >>>>A minor nit: update the maintainer name in debian/copyright for the >>>>next upload. >>>> >>>>Christoph >>> >>> >>>Hello, >>> >>> >>>DO NOT DO THAT AGAIN! >>> >>>RFH does not mean, that the package is not maintained. You should have >>>coordinated the upload with the current maintainer - at least the ITA >>>mail should be send some days/weeks *before* the upload. >>> >>>Ionut is the future maintainer who has coordinated with me. Ionut, >>>please send your own ITA mail to the bug report mentioned above. We will >>>discuss privately how to fix the problem. >>> >> >>First, that's a RFA, not RFH[1]. >>[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307358 >> >>I think i am following the directive in [2]. And I am sorry that i am >>not familiar with the polite/rule you mentioned here. maybe you should >>submit a patch to improve this directive. >> >>[2] http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3 >> RFA If you are going to adopt a package, retitle its bug to replace >>‘RFA’ with ‘ITA’, in order for other people to know the package is being >>adopted and to prevent its automatic removal from the archive, and set >>yourself as the owner of the bug. To actually adopt the package, upload >>it with your name in its Maintainer: field, and close this bug once the >>package has been installed. >> >>Anyway, you or Ionut can maintain this package. I don't care. >> >>Thanks. >> >>-- >>Li Daobing >> > > > Hello everyone! > > Sorry, that was my fault. I more or less did it for grace > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307357 > > but not for grace6. grace and grace6 are maintained together, so knowing > it done for grace, I forgot about grace6. > > Sorry for your wasted time, > Ionut >
OK, I give up adopting package grace6. I think it's better that you(Ionut) taking over grace and grace6. Good Luck. -- Li Daobing
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
