Hi, On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 09:46:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > Yes, I think I understand what you want. > > You want something that is a non-imperative equivalent to > > "Conflicts: udev (<< 0.060-1)" > > i.e. one that wouldn't force the result, but would recommend it.
That's it. > > And conflicting with udev (<< 0.060-1) isn't satisfactory either > > In that case, I think you'll have to compromise on one of the two > options you don't like, since I'm pretty sure you can't > "anti-recommends" something with current deb format. If there's currently no way to set up such things, it might be worth suggesting to add such a feature to next-generation .deb format. Don't you think so? Oh, and I just thought there could be a workaround. I could make a new no-udev empty package that conflicts with udev, and then write "Recommends: no-udev | udev (>= 0.060-1)". I guess this would behave as expected, but I think that having one more package only for this would be quite insane! Cheers, Nicolas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
