On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 03:13:47PM -0400, Ryan Schultz wrote: > On Monday 11 July 2005 02:22 pm, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 01:28:00PM -0400, Ryan Schultz wrote: > > > I went ahead and backported all of the 0.0.4 changes into the 0.0.3 code > > > (to keep the shipped OpenSPC code), and I'm still working out some of the > > > kinks (I do believe that the GNU autotools hate me) but it's otherwise > > > working. > > > > > > BTW, where is this bit about PIC at in the Policy? I looked through the > > > Shared Library section but I couldn't find anything... > > > > It's currently only in the release team's rc policy. Both documents > > got a bit out of sync lately... Hopefully with the new members in the > > policy team we can fix that in the near future. As non-PIC libs cause > > FTBFS on some arches it is almost always a RC bug anyway, policy or not. > > > > Gruesse, > > Well, libopenspc will FTBFS on all arches but i386, since the core is a bunch > of x86 ASM written by hand, so I've set it to Architecture: i386 in > debian/control. Is this the right thing to do? If I do this, can I safely > override the PIC lintian error? You need to make sure the package is listed in "packages-arch-specific":
http://www.buildd.net/buildd/Packages-arch-specific Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
