On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:01:56 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) said:

> Jarle Aase wrote:
>> I'm about to make some .deb packages. Some will hopefully be accepted
>> as official packages, while others will be built for my own
>> convenience (to ease installation and upgrades on Debian servers I
>> maintain).
>> 
>> The packages includes shared C++ libraries, binaries, databases
>> (MySQL) and some Java programs.

[...]

> For your own purposes I would just maintain the packages on the oldest
> of the tracks that you need to support.  That is, if sarge is the
> oldest that you need to support then just use a sarge build for your
> own use on sarge, etch, and sid. ...

That probably won't work due to the C++ ABI transition.  For a C
package, it may work.  Also, sid may have additional packages that
enable extra functionality that you would want with the sid package.

> The pbuilder package is useful to set up a chroot and build against
> woody on sarge and other combinations.

I'm facing the same question as Jarle, and this is what I was planning
on doing.  You may need to maintain a diff between the sid/sarge/woody
versions, if there's any difference (such as in the control file).

-- 
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7  5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net.   Encrypted e-mail preferred.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to