On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: > There are several things that linda(1) complains about, some of them: > E: softgun; Object /usr/lib/softgun/dm9000.so is not directly linked > against libc. > The binary object shown above is not directly linked against the > required library libc.so.6. > W: softgun; Shared binary object /usr/lib/softgun/dm9000.so has no > dependency information. > The binary object listed above is a shared object, but does not report > that it depends on any other shared libraries.
Interesting, it passes linda silently here, although lintian did issue a shared library warning: N: Processing source package softgun (version 0.10-1) ... N: ---- N: Processing binary package softgun (version 0.10-1) ... W: softgun: shared-lib-without-dependency-information ./usr/lib/softgun/dm9000.s It seems that my mirror has an older version of linda, will update from another mirror. > As I see that library is linked with -nostdlib (config.mk) and uses libc > functions. I think you should add -lc to link parameters. dm9000.so is in fact a plug-in module and not a standard shared library, hence the linda and lintian warnings. I didn't find any special considerations about this case in the manuals, although I may have missed something. > Also there are typos in manpage: s/softdog/softgun/ Oops, that's what happens when you work with softdog and softgun at the same time. Will fix. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
