On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 04:57:20PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 03:21:06PM +0200, GCS wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 03:35:49PM +0200, Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > what exactly don't you like about the description? i checked it and > > > think its fine... > > Usually people asked not to start the description with the package name; > > "Efficiently ..." would be just fine. Please read [4]. > > ok fixed. but neither [4] nor the policy says anything about that, just > about the short description, perhaps it needs updating...
patches are welcome... > > > > i did a -2 version with the fixes and put it at > > You don't have to increase the Debian version I think; but it's not a > > problem. > > better safe than sorry. i made a -3 with the updated description > available at http://www.semistable.com/files, please have a look. neither -1 nor -2 went into Debian archive, there is no reason to start with -3 as the first one in the archive. Use 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 ectera. (sorry I have no URL where I red that) Cheers Geert Stappers
