Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 20:54 +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> On a related note, I'd also be very happy if it was a requirement to
>> build libraries with a miniumum of "-g -ggdb -gdwarf-2", and not strip
>> them. We could provide some mechanism to automatically strip
>> binaries, surely?
>
> I believe that this was discussed before and never really got off of the
> ground because of the bandwidth issues involved.
>
> By the way, doesn't "-ggdb3" provide more verbose debugging information?
Yes, or '-g3' which is equivalent. I find this essential when
debugging inline C++ code, such as templates. I think
-g3 -gdwarf-2
should be the shortest way to write it.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
