> PS: > > Zen my library is perfect but if you want I'll try my best to > add some bugs
Hey, your libary may well be perfect :) More power to you, dude! http://www.gnu.org/directory/ is the top level GNU software page, and here is the GNU mathematics packages page: http://www.gnu.org/directory/science/math/ And those pages don't even seem to list glpk - GNU Linear Programming Kit (but searching from those pages for "glpk" finds it). Your stuff sounds like it might be nicely complementary. Anyway, my only point is there is a lot of software out there, and it is useful to tell people what makes yours different/ better/ etc., especially if you want to enlist supporters/ testers/ users/ documentors/ etc. For uploading, there are probably some free sites you can upload to, eg. sourceforge.net, freshmeat.net, geocities (?), savannah.org, etc. You can choose to make your software an official GNU project, or simply package it for a GNU/Linux distribution such as the widely popular and highly recommended Debian. For packaging, you might be interested in the New Maintainers Guide, found by scrolling down from this page: http://www.debian.org/devel/ Alternatively you can simply hope that one day someone else will package it. Initially, the simplest route is to find some place to upload it (eg. create a sourceforge site) and tell people about it - announce it to the Debian.org, www.GNU.org and Slashdot.org websites. On licensing: GPL: The minimum requirements imposed (on users of your library), to guarantee maximum freedoms are maintained over the long term. LGPL ("Lesser" GPL): "Maintains" less freedom-preserving requirements than the GPL, by allowing Proprietary applications to link with your library. This may be a good thing to get more users, especially if your library is competing with others out there. If your library is unique, you may not wish to "give away your effort for nothing", and use the GPL instead (like the company Trolltech does with their QT software - you can buy licenses to QT if you want to release Proprietary software; that's how that company makes money). X/MIT: Essentially public domain - people can take your code and relicense it under Proprietary license. This is probably not what you want. Some people say this is "more" freedom than the GPL provides, which is kind of true. But history shows us that there is today an enormous body of GPL software out there, so the GPL, for various reasons, has certainly resulted in a lot of Free Software. Which for many of us is The Worthy Goal (TM). BTW, don't confuse Proprietary with Commercial with Free Software. Proprietary and Free Software are opposites, Commercial and Non-commercial are opposites and both Free and Proprietary software can be either of Commercial, or Non-commercial. Eg., You can give away Proprietary software gratis, and you can charge (a lot of money in fact) for distribution and enhancement of Free Software. cheers zen
