also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.28.2218 +0200]: > Patch cannot delete files.
It can:
-E or --remove-empty-files
Remove output files that are empty after the patches
have been applied. Normally this option is unnecessary,
since patch can exam‐ ine the time stamps on the header to
determine whether a file should exist after patching.
However, if the input is not a context diff or if
patch is conforming to POSIX, patch does not remove
empty patched files unless this option is given. When
patch removes a file, it also attempts to remove any
empty ancestor directories.
So I wonder what `dpkg-source -x` is using. Is it forcing
POSIX compatibility? It does not look like it, this is how
dpkg-source calls patch:
patch -s -t -F 0 -N -p1 -u -V never -g0 -b -z .dpkg-orig
So by the above logic, it *should* remove deleted (emptied) files.
Ah, I guess it's because dpkg-source uses unified instead of context
diffs. I wonder why, and what context diffs offer that unified ones
don't.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
