On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 11:53:27AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > >That's correct except that you want "non-free" there, not "free". > >(Ever think you'd hear a Debian developer say that?) > > would it be sacreligious to ask why sources are kept in non-free?
I think one of us is confused. :) Source for non-free packages is in non-free, but if you aren't interested in that or would rather avoid it you're of course entirely welcome to omit the "non-free" word from that line. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
