[Please CC me, as I'm not on debian-mentors.] Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Aside from the results of the thread that followed (discuss with web people > who > maintain WNPP lists etc.), I still think it uneccessarily lowers visibility > of RFSs.
How's that? Rather than being available in the archives of debian-mentors, a list of packages awaiting sponsorship will be available on the web and in the WNPP report. > Also: What are the harms of the current system? If anyone wants to (and some > people > do), they can always send a mail to the ITP announcing they're now in the > process of > seeking a sponsor. Developers have to search the archives of debian-mentors to see if the package is still being developed or is awaiting a sponsor. Why use a BTS instead of reporting bugs to a mailing list? -- Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux
