On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 08:55:49PM +0100, Pete Ryland wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 06:36:13PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > I say simple, but then, I didn't write the decompiler. :)
(Actually I didn't write that ...) > > Note that, IIRC, the Java .class format doesn't store the names of local > > variables in methods, so you lose a good deal of intelligibility during > > the decompilation process. > > They actually /can/ be, given the right compiler flags, but obviously the > JVM doesn't care either way. It's useful to have them when debugging > though. Oh, cool. What options? This machine only has gcj, whose man page doesn't seem to list anything relevant. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
