-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Ludovic Drolez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>>Easy. Version in sid *must* be > then the one in woody. >> >>Easy but....how do you solve the problem ? > > > Using a version number thats >the woody and < the sid one? :) > > >>Currently, I have: >>testing: weex 2.6.1-4 >>unstable: weex 2.6.1-5 > > > 2.6.1-4woody1? > > Thanks ! It works much better ! However, the ftp upload was not rejected but yesterday I received the following message for the debian installer: ######## Rejected: weex_2.6.1-4woody1.dsc is NEW for woody-proposed-updates. Rejected: weex_2.6.1-4woody1_i386.deb is NEW for woody-proposed-updates. Rejected: weex_2.6.1-4woody1.diff.gz is NEW for woody-proposed-updates. === Despite being ACCEPTed, this package failed the database sanity checks at the time of install. This should only happen rarely and in corner-cases (a binary upload of a package which has since been melanie'd for example), so no code to do the necessary unaccept actions has been written. These actions (e.g. bug reopening, announcement rescinding, etc.) will have to be done by hand. Also, the files have been left in the accepted directory; please deal with them as well. ########### I've sent a few weeks ago, a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to notify that weex segfaults in testing and not in unstable, and I did not receive any reply... I guess that's why my package is NEW and Rejected ? Needs manual intervention ? Ludo. - -- http://www.palmopensource.com - The PalmOS Open Source Portal http://www.drolez.com - Personal site - Linux and PalmOS stuff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAj05OJ8ACgkQsRlQAP1GpphsmgCfSz5v4AzSCZ+xncB3yq3HMLK9 EsoAnA4tdCTqtBxfiE/NeFRYlLqBPZ1L =8Sps -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
