Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I consider this licence is DFSG conpliant, so I will put this 2 > libraries in main.
It sounds reasonable to me. The only thing that sounds a little questionable is this: > Permission is hereby also granted, without written agreement and > without license or royalty fees, to distribute binary programs which > depend on this package, provided that: > > if the binary program depends on a modified version of this > package, you must publicly release the modified version of > this package - for example by submitting it to the Eiffel > Forum archive (http://www.eiffel-forum.org/archive/) You might want to confirm that putting the required modified base package in the Debian archive is a sufficiently public release. I'd expect it would be, though. -- David Maze [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~dmaze/ "Theoretical politics is interesting. Politicking should be illegal." -- Abra Mitchell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]