Henning Niss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Indeed it seems that lablgtk which depends on an exact version of > ocaml (at least on some architectures) may be the culprit. From > update_excuses.html: > > * lablgtk (- to 1.2.1-3) [...] > + lablgtk (source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, > mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) is buggy! (1 > 0) [...] > > Might this be the reason?
Shouldn't be. What I said only applies to packages which are already in testing -- lablgtk is not. (... later ...) The only packages in testing which depend on "ocaml (>= 3.01), ocaml (<< 3.02)" and which would be made uninstallable unless they are unpgraded in the same run are: lablgl, mlgtk, ocaml-tools, ocamltk. These are all "Valid candidates" though, so my hypothesis seems not to apply. -- Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
