On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 01:06:20AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Argh. Please send that information to [EMAIL PROTECTED], to help increase
I will, and for mine (104151) to :-) > Make sure you investigate web server support and affected packages first. The > more information you provide, the better informed people will be about the > proposal. I've already do it to increase chance to have an answer before policy freeze. I'm looking for second (104146). But my first question is : Is it allowed or not ? > > > This change may create some bugs against http server while currently all > > package directly that install cgi under /usr/lib/cgi-lib work without > > change the server configuration, I'm not sure this be easy to for > > subdirectory. > > I know that boa at least does not support this (#90601), but Apache certainly > does, and I'm pretty sure that Roxen does as well. I haven't to much time to look at this closer :-( I think that we should have more than one httpd virtual kind. There is some without cgi capability, and some with. And you point to me there is other sub-category. Rémi Perrot
