[I think Colin reads this list, but CCing @packages to be sure.] Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> undocumented(7) is in the manpages package (Priority: important). It seems > sensible to allow users to remove this package without breaking anything, and > if they care enough to remove the manpages package, they probably won't miss > undocumented(7). Wouldn't it be better to just move undocumented(7) (it's 1415 bytes, FWIW) to man-db? This way all users of "man" would have it. Thinking a bit further ... symlinking to undocumented is often frowned upon, because it muddles up the issue (and novice packagers often conveniently think that it is a permanent solution), and sometimes raises false expectations (i.e. I install a package, look at "dpkg -L" output, think: fine, a manpage is provided). Sooo, why not patch the man binary to issue a more helpful message? I.e. if manpage FOO was sought, and FOO exists in {,/usr}/{,s}bin: No manual entry for FOO This is probably a bug you should report. In the mean time, please try to find usage information through other means -- try "man undocumented" if you are unsure. -- Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature