On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:17:01 +0100, Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 11:01:22AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: >> >And if it's a wrapper >> >script, wouldn't it be a lot better to have the wrapper in /usr/bin, >> >with the real program called something like foo.real, and just the >> >variable settings in /etc? >> >> Everything else would be a policy violation. > >Please explain how my suggest would violate policy.
It wouldn't. > If it's the Right >Thing to do, and it violates policy, we should modify policy. Having non-conffile executeable code in /etc would violate policy, and this is what we both try to avoid. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15 Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
