--- Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Christian Marillat > > | MAS> Indeed, but for package naming purpose I > guess calling > | MAS> them libglib2 and libgtk2 would work. > | > | I disagree. The API may change between 1.3.5 and > 2.0 > > Please LART upstream heavily and give the packages a > proper name. That > tradition has done it wrong is no reason to continue > doing it the > wrong way. > > *sigh* </rant-of-the-week> > Well this is a bit late :) Following the current Debian package names I am calling them libglib1.3, libgtk+1.3 since they are not backward-compatible with the 1.2 series yet might change prior to version 2.0
Thanks anyway, that post was careless of me. Michel ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
