Brett Cundal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Basically, when I build my package it makes the correct packages, > but the docs are included in both packages. [...] I'm sure that's > totally vague, but if someone could point me in the right direction > or let me know what info is required to help out that would be > great.
The usual way people do multiple binary packages is that debian/rules calls the package's install method with one target directory and then for each package, it moves this package's files from that directory into the package's staging directory. A simple example: # everything into debian/tmp $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=debian/tmp # docs into foo-doc's dir mv debian/tmp/usr/share/doc debian/foo-doc/usr/share/doc # the rest into foo's dir mv debian/tmp debian/foo (For real world examples, peruse your favourite package which has a -doc or -dev. You could also try dh_make, selecting the multi-binary package option.) dh_movefiles may be used instead of the "mv"s. > Should I just read up on automake/autoconf, or is there some simple > way to do this? If your upstream uses this, that would be certainly no bad idea. It's not strictly necessary for your problem, though. > It looks like the current maintainer just commented out the docs > installs and moved them into debian/rules, That breaks of course when the Makefile changes. If patches to upstream Makefiles can be avoided, that's better. > but what if the split was more complicated? See above. The moving method breaks only when some files or directories get added that belong in the -doc, but which you do not yet handle. They will end up in the "catch-all" package instead. > I've gathered that debhelper throws the docs into the -doc > package because it's marked arch-indep, [...] I don't know of such a thing. Which dh_* command would do this? > How does debian/rules know what goes in which package? Debhelper expects that a subdirectory in the debian directory exists for each package which will hold the files belonging to that package. (Your rules should contain "export DH_COMPAT=2" or a higher number, or the paragraph above is not entirely correct. See debhelper(1) for details.) > It's all magic to me at the moment... I haven't seen any > docs that cover this stuff yet - if anyone can point them out... I found that the debhelper manpages were a fine description of the steps necessary to create packages. Even if one does not use debhelper they are a good read. -- Robbe
signature.ng
Description: PGP signature
