That would be easier. I did sort of want to keep a Makefile in place that is called Makefile, so that a simple "make" command still works, but I guess that could be taken care of by a symlink. Thanks for the suggestion.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 12:37:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jimmy> Why is it not sufficient to do something like the following > Jimmy> pseudo-code in debian/rules: > > [Delete hack with amke/cp/sed/make/cp back] > > Would it not be simpler just to use > > $(MAKE) -f Makefile.with.ssl > $(MAKE) -f Makefile.without > > See, no sed, no copying back and forth, and one can build with > or without ssl packages independently. > > manoj > -- > I'm ZIPPY the PINHEAD and I'm totally committed to the festive mode. > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> > 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E > 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
