On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:46:50PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > On Monday 27 November 2000 19:39, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I wonder about this error: > > ...SNIP... > > N: Processing binary package libmcal0 (version 0.6-3) ... > > E: libmcal0: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib usr/lib/libmcal.so.0.6 > > libmcal N: > > N: The package should not only include the shared library itself, but > > N: also the symbolic link which ldconfig would produce. (This is > > N: necessary, so that the link gets removed by dpkg automatically when > > N: the package gets removed.) > > N: > > N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 4.3 for details. > > N: > > N: Processing binary package libmcal-dev (version 0.6-3) ... > > ...SNIP... > > > > Why does this occur? And what should I do about it? > > I think libmcal0 package should have a symlink libmcal.so.0->libmcal.so.0.6.
The strange thing is that I have that. Verified via install and check :) // Ola -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 584 36 LINKÖPING | | +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
