Yves Arrouye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I want to package something based on date (development snapshot) but >w/o epochs (as I'm not sure where to start the epoch and how to drop it >later).
You can never drop an epoch. Once you've introduced one, you have to keep it or a higher epoch for the lifetime of that package name. >If that works, why are the KDE packages using an epoch (4) instead of >just 2.0-DATE-DEBIANRELEASE? I guess there was some numbering problem at some point in the past. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
