>>>> "SC" == Seth Cohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

SC> Sorry if my previous reply reads like a flame, that wasn't my intention.
SC> I've been reading the back and forth you've had with others over the
SC> BTS so far, unhappily.  Maybe new maintainers need a good lesson in
SC> the use of the BTS system as part of the process of joining?

I maintain some packages for a long times now:

I've closed (with my sponsor) my first bug the  22 Sep 1999 ;-)

Christian

Reply via email to