On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 06:06:24PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote: > > As far as I can see, it complies with the DFSG - looks like standard > > BSD-type fare. Comments? > > > > see part 3, derived works. that violates the open source guidelines. that > doesn't mean i'm not brimming with glee that we have access to it of course.
* 3. The names "Sphinx" and "Carnegie Mellon" must not be used to * endorse or promote products derived from this software without * prior written permission. To obtain permission, contact * [EMAIL PROTECTED] cf. BSD license: 4. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. BSD is DFSG-free - how is the Sphinx license not?
