On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 05:44:22PM +0100, Christoph Baumann wrote: > Hi! > > I know this has been discussed before, but I weren't concerned and didn't > listen, sorry. Just now I submitted an ITP for a package which contains a > GIF file in it's docu. Should I try to convert it into e.g. JPEG?
I am not a lawyer, but the way things seem to me, there is no harm in distributing the .gif -- and depending on which program was used to create the gif (photoshop, Micros~1 products, etc) it can even be legal. On principal, however, convert the silly thing, send the new .jpg upstream, and be done with it. It makes a nice statement. (If .gif was selected because it is better at handling computer-generated images, you might want to convert to .png -- many linux programs that can deal with jpg can also deal with pngs, and png is lossless -- making it look better for all images, but noticably better for computer-generated images. hth :) -- Seth Arnold | http://www.willamette.edu/~sarnold/ Hate spam? See http://maps.vix.com/rbl/ for help Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
